Chandigarh, December 16th
Much to the shame of the Punjab state, the Punjab Haryana High Court has taken a “leisurely manner choosing to proceed with the prosecution” in cases registered under its tort (prevention) provision. literally denounced it. law and criminal law of India.
Appellant cannot be arrested
Due to the fact that more than two-and-a-half years have passed since the appellant’s detention, and the lack of sanctions, the court is not obliged to recognize and serves no useful purpose to keep the appellant in custody. — Bench
The allegation came when the departmental bench granted bail to the defendant after the state made it clear that it was entirely responsible for benefiting the appellant. Defendant, in an appeal filed through Attorney Arnav Soud, has filed his FIR on June 6, 2020 at Chattiwind Police Station, and his July 28, Amritsar Special Court. I contested the denial of my third bail application.
The FIR was originally submitted under Article 295 of the IPC. After the appellant and another person received confidential information that said, among other things, that people belonging to the community should have their heads chopped off and deported from the state. The person was subsequently arrested.
GS Sandhawalia Judges and Harpreet Kaur Jeewan Judges observed the appellant’s arrest on June 6, 2020. HC. On October 16, 2020, he was dismissed by one judge, but the appeal was due to be heard by the department’s bench.
Charan has been presented and realizes the trial will take time to come to a conclusion. However, in view of the FIR motion, the bail application was denied for lack of new grounds. The court argued that following the clear violation of Article 21 of the Constitution and the law set by the Supreme Court in the case of “Indian Union v. KA Najib”, the issue could not be left standing. Where the state chooses to continue.